{"id":156,"date":"2023-07-20T05:12:14","date_gmt":"2023-07-20T05:12:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/?p=156"},"modified":"2023-07-20T05:12:14","modified_gmt":"2023-07-20T05:12:14","slug":"a-pragmatist-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/?p=156","title":{"rendered":"A pragmatist case &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"149\" height=\"225\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/coverimage.webp\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-157\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ethics in the boardroom is fraught with complexity. Whose interests do directors protect? Whose causes do they advance? On what basis &#8211; what ethical considerations &#8211; do they make those determinations? And how do they come to consensus about what is the right thing to do, or the right way to do it? These issues are aired in a <strong>collection of essays<\/strong> complied by Till Talaulicar in a new <em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.elgaronline.com\/view\/book\/9781800880603\/9781800880603.xml\">Research Handbook on Corporate Governance and Ethics<\/a><\/em>, published by Edward Elgar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>My contribution<\/strong> to it is called &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4337\/9781800880603.00030\">A pragmatist case for thoughtfulness and experimentation in corporate governance<\/a>.&#8221; It conducts a series of thought experiments and considers how directors &#8211; you  and I &#8211; might reason our way to a decision. The chapter builds a case for act-based ethics, rather than following rules, especially when the situations are novel and directors are divided over which type of ethical consideration apply.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ethics in the boardroom is fraught with complexity. Whose interests do directors protect? Whose causes do they advance? On what basis &#8211; what ethical considerations &#8211; do they make those determinations? And how do they come to consensus about what is the right thing to do, or the right way to do it? These issues &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/?p=156\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">A pragmatist case &#8230;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[16,8,35],"class_list":["post-156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-management","tag-boards-of-directors","tag-corporate-governance-2","tag-ethics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=156"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":158,"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/156\/revisions\/158"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nordberg.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}